Summary Show Binance Wallet, Bybit and Bitget canceled SpaceX pre-IPO offerings after failing to secureSummary Show Binance Wallet, Bybit and Bitget canceled SpaceX pre-IPO offerings after failing to secure

SpaceX IPO scramble reveals difference between tokenizing a stock and getting one

2026/06/13 13:16
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
Summary
Show
  • Binance Wallet, Bybit and Bitget canceled SpaceX pre-IPO offerings after failing to secure shares through xStocks.
  • The issue wasn't tokenization itself but getting access to the underlying asset, industry participants said.
  • SpaceX's IPO saw overwhelming retail demand that far exceeded available shares, leaving many retail orders only partially filled or unfilled.

The race to get into the SpaceX IPO left many crypto investors on the sidelines.

Binance Wallet, Bybit and Bitget canceled SpaceX pre-IPO offerings on Friday and refunded customers after failing to secure shares promised through xStocks, Kraken's tokenized equities business. The platforms had marketed the offering as a way for retail investors to gain access to one of the most sought-after IPOs in years through tokenized shares.

“Due to xStocks’ inability to deliver the underlying assets, no SpaceX allocations were received,” Bybit told users.

The episode, at first glance, might look like a failure of tokenization. But industry participants say the real bottleneck was much simpler: access to the underlying asset.

Too much demand, not enough shares

Getting access to SpaceX shares was always going to be difficult.

The company sought to raise $75 billion, with an initial plan to reserve 30% of the offering for retail investors. Demand quickly overwhelmed that allocation. Bloomberg reported retail orders exceeded $100 billion, while CNBC reported that the retail portion was cut to the low-20% range before pricing.

One person familiar with the matter told CoinDesk that xStocks and its distribution partners gathered more than $1 billion in customer orders. But when underwriters finalized allocations, many of those requests went unfilled.

Binance, Bybit and Bitget received no shares and canceled their offerings. Meanwhile, customers of Kraken and xStocks received only a fraction of the allocations they requested.

The shortfall wasn't limited to crypto platforms, though. Data compiled by Access IPOs showed some retail investors at traditional brokerages received only a portion of the shares they had sought.

An xStocks spokesperson said "overwhelming demand" prevented all orders from being fulfilled and that funds tied to unfilled subscriptions had been returned.

The firm's tokenized SpaceX stock, trading under the ticker SPCXx, still launched after the IPO. About $24 million worth of the tokenized shares were circulating onchain at publication time, according to Arkham data. Ondo Finance and Dinari, which did not offer pre-IPO access, also launched tokenized SpaceX products following the company's market debut.

Lesson for tokenized asset

The episode underscores a key lesson for tokenized assets. Creating a token is easy; securing the real asset behind it is the crucial part.

“What appears to have gone wrong… is that demand significantly exceeded the available supply of underlying shares,” a spokesperson for tokenization platform Dinari said. "If the underlying stock cannot be sourced, allocated and held within the necessary regulatory framework, there is ultimately no asset to tokenize."

In this particular case, SpaceX's retail allocations were cut, demand surged and there weren't enough shares available to satisfy all orders.

The result was a reminder that tokenized assets remain tied to the markets beneath them. As one industry participant put it to CoinDesk, the problem was a case of "overpromising and underdelivering" rather than a failure of the technology itself.

"Blockchain rails performed as designed," said in an X post Olivia Vande Woude, who leads tokenization business development at Ava Labs. "What broke was something older and more mundane: the work of actually sourcing the shares."

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Luck, Stupidity, and Getting Ripped Off

Luck, Stupidity, and Getting Ripped Off

In a previous post I recounted how luck and stupidity kickstarted my retirement savings journey, but I glossed over one important detail: the cost. In the mid-eighties
Share
Humble Dollar2026/06/28 22:27
Why an Altcoin Rally Could Start When Everything Still Looks Terrible

Why an Altcoin Rally Could Start When Everything Still Looks Terrible

The post Why an Altcoin Rally Could Start When Everything Still Looks Terrible appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The altcoin market is showing early signs
Share
CoinPedia2026/06/28 21:45

Newbies:Deposit $100, Get $1,000

Newbies:Deposit $100, Get $1,000Newbies:Deposit $100, Get $1,000

Plus Up to a $50 Referral Bonus