OpenAI’s annualized revenue was reportedly close to $50 billion at the end of September, approximately $20 billion below the $70 billion figure that had circulated only days earlier.
The difference appears large, but it does not mean OpenAI suddenly lost $20 billion in sales. It mainly reflects how revenue generated through cloud partners was counted. The real issue is that investors had been using two differently calculated figures to assess OpenAI’s growth and valuation.
Eligible traders can follow changes in OpenAI’s implied private valuation through OPENAIUSDT futures on MEXC. The contract is a derivative and does not represent ownership of OpenAI shares.
The earlier $70 billion figure was reportedly adjusted to make OpenAI’s revenue more comparable with Anthropic’s.
Anthropic includes the full value of certain sales made through cloud partners in its revenue, then records the partner’s share as an expense. OpenAI generally records only the portion of those sales that it retains.
Investors reportedly added the cloud providers’ portion back to OpenAI’s number, creating the larger $70 billion estimate. OpenAI’s own presentation placed annualized revenue closer to $50 billion.
In other words, this was primarily an accounting comparison problem—not evidence that customers suddenly stopped paying for OpenAI’s products.
Although OpenAI’s business did not suddenly shrink, the correction still matters. The $70 billion figure had already shaped expectations about the company’s growth rate and ability to justify a potentially enormous valuation.
OpenAI has reportedly discussed raising capital at a valuation of around $1.4 trillion. At that valuation, the company would be valued at roughly 20 times a $70 billion revenue run rate, but approximately 28 times a $50 billion run rate.
That is a meaningful difference. A lower revenue base makes the valuation more demanding, particularly for a company that still requires substantial spending on computing infrastructure.
The revised figure therefore does not destroy OpenAI’s growth story, but it raises the standard the company must meet to support its valuation.
The phrase “annualized revenue” can make the company appear larger than its completed financial statements would show.
Annualized revenue takes sales from a recent period and assumes that pace continues for the next 12 months. It is useful for measuring a fast-growing business, but it is not the same as revenue already earned during a full year.
OpenAI is a private company and does not publish regular earnings reports. Until audited financial statements become available, investors must rely heavily on presentations, media reports and estimates that may use different definitions.
MEXC’s view is that the OpenAI revenue gap should be treated as a transparency shock rather than a demand collapse.
A $50 billion annualized revenue figure still points to rapid commercial growth. The concern is that the earlier number created a more optimistic impression of the company’s scale, making OpenAI’s valuation appear less expensive than it may actually be.
The next question is therefore not whether OpenAI lost $20 billion overnight. It is whether the company can provide consistent revenue definitions and demonstrate that its retained revenue is growing fast enough to support its valuation and computing costs.
OpenAI reportedly told investors that annualized revenue was approaching $50 billion at the end of September 2026.
The larger figure reportedly included an adjustment for sales made through cloud partners, allowing investors to compare OpenAI with companies that use a different revenue-accounting method.
The available information does not prove that OpenAI lost revenue or missed an official target. It shows that the widely reported $70 billion figure was calculated differently from the company’s own approximately $50 billion figure.
The lower figure makes OpenAI’s reported valuation look more demanding and raises questions about the consistency of financial information provided to investors.
OpenAI remains privately held, and the reported figures have not been confirmed through public audited financial statements. OPENAIUSDT is a leveraged derivative rather than company equity, and its price may differ substantially from private funding valuations or any future IPO price.


