Rollup is the most common Layer 2 solution in the current market. Rollup solutions can be divided into two categories: Optimistic Rollups and ZK Rollups. This article will introduce ZK Rollups. 1.Rollup is the most common Layer 2 solution in the current market. Rollup solutions can be divided into two categories: Optimistic Rollups and ZK Rollups. This article will introduce ZK Rollups. 1.
The Highly Anticipated ZK Rollup: What is It?
Rollup is the most common Layer 2 solution in the current market. Rollup solutions can be divided into two categories: Optimistic Rollups and ZK Rollups. This article will introduce ZK Rollups.
1. What is ZK Rollup?
ZK stands for Zero Knowledge, which refers to Zero-Knowledge Proofs. Zero-Knowledge Proofs allow users to prove their knowledge of critical data or ownership without revealing sensitive information, like the private keys to their wallet.
Rollup is a Layer 2 solution that improves efficiency by bundling multiple transactions together. After the transactions are completed, the transaction data is sent back to the main network. Rollup focuses on scaling and improving transaction performance while relying on the main network for security.
ZK Rollup is a solution that utilizes validity proofs to scale computations. It performs computations off-chain and submits validity proofs back to the main chain.
2. ZK Characteristics
The basic principle of ZK (Zero Knowledge) involves two parties: the Prover and the Verifier. The Prover generates a proof, and the Verifier verifies the proof without gaining access to the actual information. The key features include:
1. Comprehensiveness: If the Prover possesses the correct answer, they can find a way to prove its truth to the Verifier. In other words, something true cannot be proven false.
2. Soundness: If the Prover does not possess the answer, they cannot prove its truth to the Verifier. In other words, something false cannot be proven true.
3. Zero-Knowledge: During the proof process, the Verifier only gains knowledge of the proof itself and does not acquire any additional relevant information.
In the case of ZK Rollup, typically only the first two properties of ZK are applied to achieve compressed computation and reduce costs. As a result, user transaction information remains queryable.
3. Advantages and Disadvantages of ZK Rollup Solutions
1. Fast Asset Transfers: Compared to Optimistic Rollups, which require approximately 7 days for verification, ZK Rollups offer much faster asset transfers. This is due to the different validation processes of the two Rollup solutions. After transaction data is processed on the Layer 2 network:
- ZK Rollup generates a zero-knowledge proof when submitting the block to the Ethereum mainnet. The mainnet nodes verify this proof, and users generally have no perceptible delay.
- Optimistic Rollup has a waiting period of 7 days, during which Ethereum mainnet nodes can challenge and prove a transaction to be false.
2. Low Transaction Costs: ZK Rollup performs computations off-chain and submits validity proofs to the main chain, avoiding the need to send all transaction data back to the mainnet. This reduces transaction costs. Additionally, the proof file is small and verification time remains constant, so the proof itself does not increase in size with the number of transactions.
3. High Technical Difficulty: ZK Rollup employs complex zero-knowledge proof algorithms that are incompatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Therefore, developers who want to deploy Ethereum applications on Layer 2 networks using ZK Rollup must not only rebuild their applications but also learn the development languages specific to Layer 2 networks.
4. Why are ZK gas fees so high?
The gas fees paid by users mainly consist of incentives for validator nodes, gas fees for submitting to the mainnet, and storage costs.
Validator nodes confirm and broadcast transactions on behalf of users but require incentives to perform these actions. Gas fees for submitting to the mainnet increase as the mainnet becomes more congested.
Storage costs are relatively fixed. The more people who use the available resources, the lower the average cost. ZK Rollup has not yet been widely adopted, so gas fees are much higher compared to Optimistic Rollup, which is more commonly used.
5. Currently Available ZK Rollup Solutions
Among the existing EVM-compatible solutions, StarkNet, zkSync, Polygon, and Scroll are particularly notable.
5.1 StarkNet
StarkNet is developed by the StarkWare team. Unlike other ZK solutions, StarkNet utilizes STARK proofs, while other solutions employ SNARK proofs. In simple terms, these two proof systems are different in the following ways:
- STARK reduces reliance on centralization and offers enhanced security.
- SNARK enables faster verification and lower transaction fees.
5.2 zkSync
zkSync is developed by the Matter Labs team and is currently running on the zkSync Era network. The current advantages of the zkSync network include:
- Data Compression: zkSync improves data availability and reduces the cost of transactions with a large amount of input data.
- Account Abstraction: A recently introduced feature aimed at improving the user and developer experience. The initial use for this feature is to pay gas fees with any given currency.
5.3 Polygon
In addition to adopting Bytecode-level EVM compatibility methods, Polygon has also implemented a new consensus mechanism called Proof of Efficiency (POE), which enhances decentralization while increasing network security.
5.4 Scroll
Scroll was launched in February of this year and is currently in the Pre-Alpha testnet phase. Scroll aims to be fully compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) at the bytecode level. In other words, developers can use any EVM-compatible language to create smart contracts and deploy them on the Scroll platform.
Comparison Chart of the Four Solutions:
Development Phase | Programming Language | EVM Compatibility | SNARK or STARK | Fees | |
Polygon | Public Beta | Solidity | Fully Compatible with EVM | SNARK+STARK | ETH |
Scroll | Pre-Alpha | Solidity | Fully Compatible with EVM | SNARK | ETH |
zkSync Era | Public Beta | Solidity、Vyper、LLVM | Only Language Compatible | SNARK | All erc20 Tokens |
StarkNet | Alpha Mainnet | Cairo, Solidity (Using Compiler) | Only Language Compatible | STARK | STRK or ETH |
6. Future Potential
ZK Rollup solutions have achieved a balance between efficiency and privacy, offering higher TPS (Transactions Per Second) and lower costs. The main constraint on its development at this phase is primarily due to technical factors, particularly EVM compatibility. Different technology teams have proposed their own solutions and are currently in the testing phase. When these projects go live on the mainnet, it may pave the way for widespread adoption of ZK Rollup.
市场机遇
ZKsync实时价格 (ZK)
$0.012283
$0.012283$0.012283
USD
ZKsync (ZK) 实时价格图表
热门加密动态
查看更多
什么是 Lighter (LIT)？一文读懂零费用 ZK 永续合约 DEX
概述 Lighter (LIT) 是近期加密市场中关注度较高的永续合约 DEX 项目。根据 Lighter 官方文档，Lighter 是一个面向安全性、扩展性和性能优化的去中心化交易平台，主打零费用交易环境，并通过可验证的订单撮合与清算机制，尝试解决链上衍生品交易长期存在的性能与透明度问题。 与传统 AMM 型 DEX 不同，Lighter 更接近“链上订单簿 + ZK 验证”的交易架构。其目标不
别让你的比特币闲着：2026 年 BTC L2 真实收益深度横评
你的 BTC 还在钱包里睡觉？本文深度拆解 Stacks、Rootstock、Merlin Chain 等主流 Bitcoin L2 的真实收益机会，帮你读懂 BTCFi 的风险与回报，找到让闲置比特币"活起来"的正确姿势。 概述 比特币的市值已突破数万亿美元，但绝大多数持有者仍选择将 BTC 静静地锁在冷钱包里，等待价格上涨。这种"躺平"策略固然稳健，却也意味着放弃了一个正在快速成熟的收益赛道—
Multicoin Capital 重仓押注Zcash，ZEC 刷新年内高点——隐私赛道的机构信号来了？
Multicoin Capital 联合创始人披露自 2 月起大量增持 ZEC，Zcash 随即刷新年内高点，链上屏蔽供应达历史新高。本文深度解析这一机构信号背后的逻辑与投资机会。 概述 2026 年 5 月 6 日，加密货币风险投资机构 Multicoin Capital 联合创始人 Tushar Jain 在社交媒体上公开披露，该机构自今年 2 月起已在市场上持续大量建仓隐私币 Zcash（Z
热门新闻
查看更多
Coldcard Mk3 警告紧随 3800 万美元 Bitcoin 被扫荡事件，但原因仍未确认
比特币硬件钱包制造商Coinkite已警告用户，Coldcard设备存在种子生成问题，影响从4.0.1版本起的所有Mk3固件版本。该警告是在安全研究人员调查一起涉及594.48 BTC（约合3,800万美元）的协同转移事件时发出的。然而，目前尚无公开的技术证据证实Coldcard的问题导致了这些转账。
相关文章
查看更多
美股周报 10.17-10.22 | 纳指周四单日重挫2.6%，高盛称AI资本开支约占标普盈利增长一半
本周大盘回顾周四的下跌集中在AI与芯片链。芯片设备商泛林集团（LRCX）在财报电话会上说，供应链限制让收入指引本可略高一些，并称洁净室空间和部分零件的紧张会延续到2027年。当天泛林跌11.8%，英伟达跌4.4%，超微半导体跌8.1%，英特尔跌8.0%。此前一晚（周三盘后），Meta公布三季度财报：营收646亿美元，同比+26%，盘后一度涨超3%，次日却收跌7.0%。公司把2026年资本开
MEXC Alpha Trader 投研周报 | 通胀全面超预期，ETF单周失血2.28亿——降息叙事遭遇“压力测试”？
2026年10月第3周统计周期：2026年10月14日 – 10月20日数据截止：2026年10月20日核心叙事过去一周，加密市场在“通胀数据全面超预期”与“ETF资金持续流出”的双重压制下维持弱势震荡。比特币从83,000美元附近起步，周初受CPI数据冲击一度下探至81,000美元附近，随后在美债收益率高企与风险偏好反复的背景下，基本围绕82,000美元窄幅整理。截至10月20日，BTC报约81
“Uptober”惨遭打脸：ETF资金掉头，17,733枚BTC砸向市场——抄底还是逃命？ | MEXC Alpha Trader 投研周报
2026年10月第2周统计周期：2026年10月7日 – 10月13日数据截止：2026年10月13日核心叙事过去一周，加密市场经历了“十月初的惯性上冲——ETF资金逆转——杠杆清算——低位反弹”的完整循环。比特币从86,000美元上方回落，10月13日盘中一度跌破81,000美元，触发大规模多头清算，随后反弹至83,500美元附近。核心变化在于ETF资金流向的逆转。美国现货比特币ETF上周录得约
